🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a growing group of nations are exploring parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our kids' childhood". The policy could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked lawmakers to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," said the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, momentum built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. An organization established by the family of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous platform posts contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and fit for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, legislation is largely unfolding at the regional government level due to federal inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with extra use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to mimic the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The agency notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that states internationally are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.